Pharmacokinetics of oral spironolactone in infants up to 2 years of age.

PURPOSE: Spironolactone is a potassium sparing diuretic used for decades. Until now, pharmacokinetic (PK) studies of spironolactone have not been conducted in infants and therefore pediatric dosing is based on expert opinion. We aimed to describe the PK profiles of spironolactone and its main metabolites (7alpha-thiomethylspironolactone (TMS) and canrenone (CAN)) in infants up to two years of age. METHODS: The PK of spironolactone and its main metabolites were evaluated following an oral administration of spironolactone (1 mg/kg/dose) to pediatric patients with chronic heart failure, ascites, and/or oedema. The plasma concentration of spironolactone and metabolites (TMS and CAN) was determined using an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). Based on rich sampling PK data, the estimation of population PK parameters was performed using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling software Monolix 2018R2. RESULTS: A total of 150 spironolactone, 158 TMS, and 158 CAN concentrations from 23 patients (ages: 3 days-21 months; median weight 4.3 kg (2.2-12.6)) were available for PK analysis. A one-compartment model for spironolactone, TMS, and CAN best fitted the data. The median (range) of individual estimated apparent clearance values were 47.7 (11.9-138.1) L/h for spironolactone, 9.7 (1.5-66.9) L/h for TMS, and 1.0 (0.2-5.9) L/h for CAN. The disposition of spironolactone and metabolites was mainly affected by size of the patient: body weight explained 22% of inter-individual variability of spironolactone clearance. None of the undesirable effects of spironolactone was documented during the study period. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetics of spironolactone and its metabolites was highly variable between patients below 2 years of age. Body weight explained a significant part of this variability; this highlights the need to take it into account for dosing prescription in this population. (Clinical trial Registration Number 2013-001189-40).

The Pharmacokinetics of the Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Finerenone.

Finerenone, a selective and nonsteroidal antagonist of the mineralocorticoid receptor, has received regulatory approval with the indication of cardiorenal protection in patients with chronic kidney disease associated with type 2 diabetes. It is rapidly and completely absorbed and undergoes first-pass metabolism in the gut wall and liver resulting in a bioavailability of 43.5%. Finerenone can be taken with or without food. The pharmacokinetics of finerenone are linear and its half-life is 2 to 3 h in the dose range of up to 20 mg. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 (90%) and CYP2C8 (10%) are involved in the extensive biotransformation of finerenone to pharmacologically inactive metabolites, which are excreted via both renal (80%) and biliary (20%) routes. Moderate or severe renal impairment, or moderate hepatic impairment result in area-under-the-curve increases of finerenone (< 40%), which do not require a dose adjustment per se, as the starting dose is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and titrated according to serum potassium levels and eGFR decline. No relevant effects of age, sex, body size or ethnicity on systemic finerenone exposure were identified. Modulators of CYP3A4 activity were found to affect finerenone exposure, consistent with its classification as a sensitive CYP3A4 substrate. Serum potassium should be monitored during drug initiation or dosage adjustment of either a moderate or weak CYP3A4 inhibitor or finerenone, and the dose of finerenone should be adjusted as appropriate. Its use with strong inhibitors is contraindicated and strong or moderate inducers of CYP3A4 should be avoided. Finerenone has no potential to affect relevant CYP enzymes and drug transporters.

Finerenone is a drug that is used to treat patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes. Many of these patients take several medicines to treat other conditions. This review summarizes several studies showing the suitability of finerenone for these patients. Taken as a daily tablet, the dose circulates in the body before being quickly removed. The age, sex, body weight, and ethnicity of a patient do not affect dosing. As finerenone can cause an increase of serum potassium levels, potassium levels and kidney function should be measured before a patient starts treatment. The starting dose will depend on a patient's kidney function, with the dose changed according to potassium levels and changes in kidney function. A protein called cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) is key to removing finerenone from the body. Anyone taking medicines that strongly inhibit CYP3A4 should not take finerenone. Serum potassium levels should be measured before starting finerenone or changing the dose of either finerenone or 'moderate' or 'weak' CYP3A4 inhibitors, with the dose of finerenone adjusted as appropriate. Finerenone should not be taken alongside drugs that result in 'moderate' or 'strong' increases in CYP3A4 activity. In patients with moderate hepatic impairment, potassium should be monitored and finerenone doses be adjusted as appropriate. Finerenone is not expected to affect other drugs. Finerenone slows decline in kidney function, a treatment effect associated with reducing urine albumin. Potassium level-guided starting dose and dose changes support finerenone being effectively used and well tolerated in patients.

Determination of finerenone - a novel, selective, nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist - in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and its application to a pharmacokinetic study in venous and capillary human plasma.

A straightforward and rapid high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) assay allowing the sensitive and selective quantitation of finerenone (BAY 94-8862) in lithium heparin human plasma is described. Finerenone is a novel, selective, nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist that is in phase III clinical trials for the treatment of chronic kidney disease. Finerenone quantitation is performed after addition of its stable isotope-labelled internal standard (ISTD) by protein precipitation with acidified acetonitrile followed by HPLC-MS/MS separation and detection. The determination of finerenone concentrations was validated for a plasma volume of 0.100 mL and subsequently also for a lower plasma volume of 0.010 mL, collected e.g. in paediatric studies. The analytical range was from 0.100 µg/L (lower limit of quantification) to 200 µg/L (upper limit of quantification). Inter-day accuracy was 99.7-105.0% for the plasma volume of 0.100 mL and 101.1-104.5% for the plasma volume of 0.010 mL. Inter-day precision was ≤ 7.0%, independent of the extracted plasma volume. A moderate, concentration-independent matrix effect on ionisation was observed for both finerenone and its ISTD of 0.535-0.617, which is fully compensated by the ISTD (ISTD-normalised matrix factors were 0.98-1.03). The assay was successfully applied with both validated plasma volumes to a clinical phase I study in which the pharmacokinetics of 20 mg finerenone were compared in capillary plasma (0.010 mL) and venous plasma (0.100 mL) in a concentration range from the lower limit of quantification to 310 µg/L (capillary plasma) and 252 µg/L (venous plasma). The area under the plasma concentration versus time curve was similar in both matrices, while maximum concentrations were 37% higher in capillary plasma. In conclusion, capillary sampling should not bias pharmacokinetic exposure estimates compared with venous plasma values, if limited to sampling times in the distribution and elimination phases of finerenone.

Lipid-based nano-formulation platform for eplerenone oral delivery as a potential treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: in-vitro optimization and ex-vivo assessment.

PURPOSE: Eplerenone (EPL) is a selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist used for treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy which characterized by accumulation of subretinal fluid causing a localized area of retinal detachment. unfortunately, EPL suffers from poor oral bioavailability due to poor aqueous solubility in addition to high hepatic first pass metabolism. METHOD: Aiming to improve its oral bioavailability, EPL-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) were prepared by the emulsification solvent evaporation method and in-vitro evaluated for particle size (PS), polydispersity index (PDI), zeta potential (ZP), and entrapment efficiency (EE%). A D-optimal design was used for study the effect of liquid lipid to solid lipid ratio, surfactant type and percentage on PS, PDI, EE%, and for data optimization. The optimized EPL-loaded NLCs system was further evaluated using in-vitro drug release and ex-vivo permeation studies through rabbit intestine in comparison to EPL aqueous suspension. The physicochemical properties of the drug in the optimized system were further examined using FT-IR and X-ray diffraction studies. RESULTS: The resultant NLCs showed small PS (100.85-346.60 nm), homogenous distribution (0.173-0.624), negatively charged particles (ZP -20.20 to -36.75 mV), in addition to EE% (34.31-70.64%). The optimized EPL-loaded NLCs system with a desirability value of 0.905 was suggested through the Design expert® software, containing liquid to solid lipid ratio (2:1) in presence of 0.43%w/v Pluronic® F127 as a surfactant. The optimized EPL-loaded NLCs system showed a PS of 134 nm and PDI of 0.31, in addition to high EE% (76 ± 6.56%w/w), and ZP (-32.37 mV). The ex-vivo permeation study showed two-fold higher drug permeation through rabbit intestine compared to that from the aqueous drug suspension after 24 h, confirming the ability of optimized EPL-loaded NLCs system as successful oral targeting delivery carrier. CONCLUSION: Our results pave the way for a new oral nanotherapeutic approach toward CSCR treatment. In-vivo study is currently under investigation.

Phase 1 Studies to Define the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Profiles of the Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Apararenone in Healthy Volunteers.

Apararenone is a long-acting, nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA). The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles of single- and multiple-dose apararenone were assessed in 3 phase 1 randomized, double-blind studies in 223 healthy adults. Study 1 assessed the PK, safety/tolerability, and PD of single-dose apararenone (3.75-640 mg) and multiple-dose apararenone (10-40 mg/day on days 1-14, 320 mg loading dose on day 1 + 10 mg/day on days 2-14, or 40-320 mg loading dose on day 1 + 2.5-20 mg/day on days 2-14) in Caucasian and Black men and women. Study 2 assessed the PK and safety of single-dose apararenone (5-320 mg) in healthy Japanese men. Study 3 assessed the PK, PD, and safety/tolerability of single-dose apararenone (160 or 640 mg) or eplerenone (200 mg; only for 160 mg of apararenone), each after fludrocortisone challenge in Caucasian men. In studies 1 and 2, an approximately dose-proportional increase was observed in PK parameters over the apararenone dose range of 3.75-40 mg; at higher doses, a less than dose-proportional increase was observed. Food, sex, age, and race had no apparent effect on apararenone PK. A long half-life was seen for apararenone and its principal metabolite; in addition, the exposure of the metabolite was lower than that of apararenone. Apararenone suppressed the decrease in urinary sodium and potassium ion ratio that occurs after loading with fludrocortisone. These studies support the mechanism of action of apararenone as an MRA, and further clinical development is warranted.

Pharmacokinetic interactions of esaxerenone with amlodipine and digoxin in healthy Japanese subjects.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the effects of coadministration of esaxerenone with amlodipine on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of each drug, and of esaxerenone on the PK of digoxin. METHODS: In three open-label, single-sequence, crossover studies, healthy Japanese males received single oral doses of esaxerenone 2.5 mg (Days 1, 15), with amlodipine 10 mg/day (Days 8-18) (Study 1, N = 24); single doses of amlodipine 2.5 mg (Days 1, 21), with esaxerenone 5 mg/day (Days 8-25) (Study 2; N = 20); or digoxin 0.25 mg/day (Days 1-15) with esaxerenone 5 mg/day (Days 11-15) (Study 3; N = 20). PK parameters and safety were assessed. RESULTS: Study 1: esaxerenone peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and time to Cmax were unaltered by amlodipine coadministration, but mean half-life was slightly prolonged from 18.5 to 20.9 h. Geometric least-squares mean (GLSM) ratios for Cmax, area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from zero to last measurable concentration and from zero to infinity for esaxerenone + amlodipine versus esaxerenone were 0.958, 1.154, and 1.173, respectively. Study 2: corresponding GLSM ratios for amlodipine + esaxerenone versus amlodipine were 1.099, 1.185, and 1.214. Study 3: esaxerenone did not markedly alter digoxin PK. GLSM ratios for Cmax, trough plasma concentration, and AUC during a dosing interval for digoxin versus esaxerenone + digoxin were 1.130, 1.088, and 1.072, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: No drug-drug interactions are expected during combination therapy with esaxerenone and either amlodipine or digoxin, based on a lack of any clinically relevant PK changes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Studies 1 and 2: JapicCTI-163379 (registered on 20 September 2016); Study 3: JapicCTI-163443 (registered on 24 November 2016).

Drug-Drug Interaction Risk Assessment of Esaxerenone as a Perpetrator by In Vitro Studies and Static and Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models.

Esaxerenone (CS-3150) is a novel, oral, nonsteroidal, selective mineralocorticoid receptor blocker approved for the treatment of hypertension in Japan. Here, the drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential of esaxerenone was evaluated in vitro, and its impact in clinical practice was estimated. Esaxerenone exhibited time-dependent inhibition and induction of CYP3A. When the clinical impacts of esaxerenone on the inhibition and induction of CYP3A were estimated separately by using a mechanistic static model, the predicted area under the curve ratios (AUCRs) of midazolam, a typical CYP3A substrate, were 1.80 and 0.31, respectively, suggesting that the DDI potential of esaxerenone cannot be neglected. Because it was suggested that DDIs mainly occur in the intestine, predictions using concentration-time profiles in each segment of the gastrointestinal tract were performed with GastroPlus, a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling software. The predicted AUCR of midazolam was approximately 1.2, which is close to that in a clinical study, despite the difficulty of predicting DDIs for compounds with both inhibition and induction effects. When only inhibition or induction was incorporated into a model, the AUCR of midazolam changed depending on the dosing period and dose level of esaxerenone and the timing of midazolam administration. However, the AUCR calculated by incorporating both effects remained almost constant. This study shows the ability of PBPK models to simulate weak DDIs via intestinal CYP3A and that esaxerenone has low DDI potential as a perpetrator because of the offset of inhibition and induction. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Weak CYP3A inhibition and/or induction sometimes cause DDIs in the intestine but not the liver. Because strong inhibitors maximally inhibit intestinal CYP3A, the predictability of weak DDIs in the intestine should be evaluated further. Here, we simulate the DDIs of esaxerenone as a perpetrator by using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling focusing on the intestine and offset of inhibition and induction.

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists for Hypertension Management in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: BLOCK-CKD Trial.

Spironolactone, a steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, is recommended as add-on therapy for treatment-resistant/uncontrolled hypertension. However, caution is advised in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) due to an increased risk for hyperkalemia. KBP-5074 is a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist under investigation for the treatment of treatment-resistant and uncontrolled hypertension in patients with moderate-to-severe CKD. BLOCK-CKD is a phase 2, international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of KBP-5074, on top of current therapy, in patients with stage 3B/4 CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥15 and ≤44 mL/[min·1.73 m2]) and resistant hypertension (trough cuff seated systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg, despite treatment with maximally tolerated doses of 2 or more antihypertensive medicines with complementary mechanisms). Patients (n=240) will be randomized 1:1:1 to once-daily treatment with KBP-5074 0.25 mg, KBP-5074 0.5 mg, or placebo, stratified by estimated glomerular filtration rate (≥30 versus <30 mL/[min·1.73 m2]) and systolic blood pressure (≥160 versus <160 mm Hg). Approximately 30% of enrolled patients should have an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 15 to 29 mL/(min·1.73 m2). The primary efficacy analysis is the change in trough cuff seated systolic blood pressure from baseline to day 84 for the KBP-5074 doses compared with placebo. Changes in urinary albumin-creatinine ratio will be assessed along with changes in serum potassium/incidence of hyperkalemia and changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate and serum creatinine. BLOCK-CKD will determine whether the addition of KBP-5074 will effectively lower blood pressure without an increased risk of hyperkalemia in patients who are not candidates for steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists due to advanced CKD. Registration- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03574363.

Population Pharmacokinetic and Exposure-Response Analysis of Finerenone: Insights Based on Phase IIb Data and Simulations to Support Dose Selection for Pivotal Trials in Type 2 Diabetes with Chronic Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: Finerenone (BAY 94-8862) is a potent non-steroidal, selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist being developed for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. METHODS: We present the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PD) analysis for efficacy and safety markers based on data from two clinical phase IIb studies: ARTS-DN (NCT01874431) and ARTS-DN Japan (NCT01968668). RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of finerenone were adequately characterized, with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and body weight as influencing covariates. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve in Japanese patients did not differ from that in the global population, and the investigated pharmacokinetics were dose- and time-linear. In addition, the pharmacokinetic model provided robust individual exposure estimates to study exposure-response. The concentration-effect relationship over time for the efficacy marker urinary albumin:creatinine ratio (UACR) was well-characterized by a maximum effect model indicating saturation at high exposures. For the safety markers, a log-linear model and a power model were identified for serum potassium concentration and eGFR, respectively, indicating attenuation of effect gains at high exposures. There was no apparent ethnic effect on the investigated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships. The model-predicted times to reach the full (99%) steady-state drug effect on UACR, serum potassium, and eGFR were 138, 20, and 85 days, respectively, while the pharmacokinetic half-life was 2-3 h and steady state was achieved after 2 days, indicating timescale separation. CONCLUSION: Our dose-exposure-response modeling and simulation indicates effects were largely saturated at finerenone 20 mg and doses of both 10 and 20 mg once daily appear safe and efficacious at reducing albuminuria.

Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of the Mineralocorticoid Receptor Modulator AZD9977 in Healthy Men: A Phase I Multiple Ascending Dose Study.

Excessive activation of the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) underlies the pathophysiology of heart failure and chronic kidney disease. Hyperkalemia risk limits the therapeutic use of conventional MR antagonists. AZD9977 is a nonsteroidal, selective MR modulator that may protect nonepithelial tissues without disturbing electrolyte balance. This phase I study investigated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of multiple oral doses of AZD9977 in healthy volunteers. Twenty-seven male participants aged 23-45 years were randomized 3:1 to receive oral AZD9977 or placebo for 8 days (with twice-daily dosing on days 2-7), in dose cohorts of 50, 150, and 300 mg (AZD9977, n = 6 per cohort; placebo, n = 3 per cohort). Adverse events occurred in 4 of 18 participants receiving AZD9977 (22.2%) and 6 of 9 receiving placebo (66.7%), all of mild or moderate severity; none were serious or led to withdrawal. AZD9977 was rapidly absorbed, with median time of maximum concentration of 0.50-0.84 hours across dose groups. Area under the curve and maximum concentration were approximately dose proportional but elimination and accumulation terminal half-life increased with dose. Steady-state was reached after 3-4 days, with dose-dependent accumulation of 1.2-1.7-fold. Renal clearance was 5.9-6.5 L/hour and 24-37% of AZD9977 was excreted in the urine. Serum aldosterone levels increased dose dependently from days -1 to 7 in participants receiving AZD9977, but serum potassium levels and urinary electrolyte excretion were unchanged. AZD9977 was generally well-tolerated with no safety concerns. Exploratory outcomes suggested reduced hyperkalemia risk compared with MR antagonists. These findings support further clinical development of AZD9977.

Effect of Genetic and Nongenetic Factors on the Clinical Response to Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Therapy in Egyptians with Heart Failure.

This prospective cohort study evaluated the association between the renin angiotensin aldosterone system genotypes and response to spironolactone in 155 Egyptian patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Genotype frequencies for AGT rs699 were: CC = 16%, CT = 48%, and TT = 36%. Frequencies for CYP11B2 rs1799998 were: TT = 33%, TC = 50%, and CC = 17%. After 6 months of spironolactone treatment, change in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) differed by AGT rs699 (CC, 14.6%; TC, 7.9%; TT, 2.7%; P = 2.1E-26), and CYP11B2 rs1799998 (TT, 9.1%; TC, 8.7%; CC, 1.4%; P = 0.0006) genotypes. Multivariate linear regression showed that the AGT rs699 and CYP11B2 rs1799998 polymorphisms plus baseline serum potassium explained 71% of variability in LVEF improvement (P = 0.001), 63% of variability in serum potassium increase (P = 2.25E-08), and 39% of the variability in improvement in quality of life (P = 2.3E-04) with spironolactone therapy. These data suggest that AGT and CYP11B2 genotypes as well as baseline serum K are predictors of spironolactone response in HFrEF.

The human adrenal gland as a drug metabolizer: First in-vivo evidence for the conversion of steroidal drugs.

The metabolism of drugs in mammals is attributed mainly to the liver and its cytochromes P450 localized in the endoplasmic reticulum. Here, we demonstrate for the first time in humans that there is no strict subdivision between P450 s involved in exogenous and endogenous metabolism. We determined the widely used mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist spironolactone, its active metabolite canrenone and their metabolites in the adrenal venous blood of treated patients with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. 11- and 18-hydroxylated metabolites of canrenone were found in the efferent right and left adrenal veins, indicating that they were produced by the adrenal mitochondrial cytochromes P450 CYP11B1 and CYP11B2. Thus, the adrenal has to be considered as a new organ for drug metabolism. In future, application of drugs may need further investigations concerning side effects due to interactions with adrenal enzymes.

Efficacy and safety of esaxerenone (CS-3150) for the treatment of essential hypertension: a phase 2 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study.

This was a phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, open-label comparator study to investigate the efficacy and safety of esaxerenone (CS-3150), a novel non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor blocker, in Japanese patients with essential hypertension. Eligible patients (n = 426) received esaxerenone (1.25, 2.5, or 5 mg/day), placebo, or eplerenone (50-100 mg/day) for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP). Safety endpoints included adverse events and serum K+ elevation. There were significant dose-response reductions in the 2.5 and 5 mg/day esaxerenone groups for sitting BP (both p < 0.001) and 24-h BP (both p < 0.0001) compared with placebo, with a mean (95% confidence interval) change in sitting BP of -7.0 (-9.5 to -4.6)/-3.8 (-5.2 to -2.4) mmHg in the placebo group, and -10.7 (-13.2 to -8.2)/-5.0 (-6.4 to -3.6) mmHg, -14.3 (-16.8 to -11.9)/-7.6 (-9.1 to -6.2) mmHg, and -20.6 (-23.0 to -18.2)/ -10.4 (-11.8 to -9.0) mmHg for the 1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg/day esaxerenone groups, respectively, while the change was -17.4 (-19.9 to -15.0)/-8.5 (-9.9 to -7.1) mmHg for eplerenone. The incidence of adverse events was similar in all treatment groups. Serum K+ levels initially increased in proportion with esaxerenone dose but were stable from week 2 until week 12. Plasma esaxerenone concentration increased in proportion with the dose. In conclusion, esaxerenone is an effective and tolerable treatment option for patients with essential hypertension.

Absolute Bioavailability of Esaxerenone and Food Effects on its Pharmacokinetics After a Single Oral Dose in Healthy Japanese Subjects: An Open-Label Crossover Study.

INTRODUCTION: To investigate the absolute bioavailability of esaxerenone and the effects of food on its pharmacokinetics (PK) after a single oral dose in healthy Japanese subjects. METHODS: Twenty-four Japanese males aged 20-45 years were randomised to six groups (each n = 4) in this single-centre, open-label, three-way, three-period crossover study. Esaxerenone (5 mg) was administered in the fasting state as a single oral dose, single intravenous infusion over 1 h, or in the postprandial state as a single oral dose. Plasma samples were taken before and during the 96 h after drug administration. Drug concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. PK parameters were calculated using noncompartmental analysis, and safety was assessed. RESULTS: After fasting intravenous administration, total body clearance was 3.69 L h-1 and volume of distribution was 92.7 L. The plasma concentration-time profile of esaxerenone was similar after fasting and postprandial administration. Absolute bioavailability of a single oral 5-mg dose of esaxerenone was 89.0% in the fasting state and 90.8% postprandially. Point estimates (1.010 and 1.019, respectively) and 90% confidence intervals for geometric least squares mean peak plasma concentrations and area under the plasma concentration-time curve ratios after postprandial versus fasting oral esaxerenone were within the prespecified range (0.80, 1.25). No severe adverse events occurred throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: Esaxerenone has a high absolute bioavailability of approximately 90% and food has no effect on esaxerenone PK after a single oral dose of 5 mg in healthy Japanese subjects. Additionally, no safety concerns were identified. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: JapicCTI No. 163452. FUNDING: Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.

Pharmacokinetics of the Novel Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Finerenone (BAY 94-8862) in Individuals with Mild or Moderate Hepatic Impairment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Finerenone (BAY 94-8862) is a selective, nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of mild or moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of finerenone. METHODS: The study was conducted in a single-center, nonrandomized, noncontrolled, nonblinded observational design with group stratification. A single oral 5-mg dose of finerenone was administered as a tablet to participants with mild or moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh A, score 5-6 [n = 9], or Child-Pugh B, score 7-9 [n = 9], respectively) and to age-, weight- and sex-matched healthy participants (n = 9). The pharmacokinetics of finerenone and its metabolites were assessed in plasma and urine, and safety and tolerability were monitored. RESULTS: Finerenone area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and unbound AUC were 38% and 55% greater, respectively, in participants with moderate hepatic impairment than in healthy participants, whereas maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was unchanged. No clear effects on AUC or Cmax were seen in participants with mild hepatic impairment. Finerenone was safe and well tolerated in all participants. CONCLUSION: The effects of mild or moderate hepatic impairment on systemic exposure of finerenone are small, consistent with its low hepatic extraction and preponderance of gastrointestinal over hepatic first-pass clearance. Considering the small increases in AUC and the absence of changes in Cmax, a dose adaptation does not appear to be warranted in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment.

Renal function stratified dose comparisons of eplerenone versus placebo in the EMPHASIS-HF trial.

BACKGROUND: Current heart failure guidelines recommend target eplerenone dose of 50 mg/day. We have examined the effect of different eplerenone doses based on pre-specified renal function stratification in the Eplerenone in Mild Patients Hospitalization and Survival Study in Heart Failure (EMPHASIS-HF). METHODS AND RESULTS: In EMPHASIS-HF, the target dose of eplerenone/placebo was stratified at randomization according to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR): 50 mg/day if eGFR ≥ 50 mL/min/1.73 m2 and ≤ 25 mg/day if eGFR 30-49 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Patients remained within these dose ranges during the trial (as per stratification). The primary outcome was a composite of heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular mortality. Eplerenone was superior to placebo within each respective eGFR stratum [eplerenone vs. placebo in the eGFR ≥ 50 mL/min/1.73 m2 stratum: hazard ratio (HR) 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.74; and eplerenone vs. placebo in the eGFR 30-49 mL/min/1.73 m2 stratum: HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.49-0.78; Pinteraction = 0.89]. Despite receiving lower eplerenone doses, patients in the eGFR 30-49 mL/min/1.73 m2 stratum more often had hyperkalaemia, renal failure events, and drug discontinuation. CONCLUSION: In EMPHASIS-HF the eplerenone dose was stratified according to renal function and the treatment effect was not influenced by renal function: 25 mg/day in patients with eGFR 30-49 mL/min/1.73 m2 was as effective as 50 mg/day in patients with eGFR > =50 mL/min/1.73 m2 . However, patients with impaired renal function experienced more adverse events, despite reveiving lower eplerenone doses. Current guidelines do not recommend tailoring the dose of eplereone according to renal function but the current data suggest they should.

Antihypertensive Agents in the Dialysis Patient.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Hypertension and antihypertensive drug utilization are remarkably prevalent in ESRD patients. Management of blood pressure elevation in this population is complicated by many factors, including a multidimensional etiology, challenges in obtaining accurate and appropriately timed blood pressure measurements, highly specific drug dosing requirements, and a paucity of outcomes-based evidence to guide management decisions. The purpose of this review is to summarize and apply knowledge from existing clinical trials to enhance safe and effective use of antihypertensive agents in dialysis patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Two meta-analyses have established the benefit of antihypertensive therapy in ESRD. Data supporting the use of one antihypertensive class over another is less robust; however, beta-blockers have more clearly demonstrated improved cardiovascular outcomes in prospective randomized trials. Interdialytic home blood pressure monitoring has been demonstrated to be better associated with cardiovascular outcomes than clinic pre- or post-dialysis readings and should ideally be considered as a routine part of blood pressure management in this population. As data from small trials provides limited guidance for the management of hypertension in ESRD, more research is needed to guide medication selection and utilization. Specifically, large prospective randomized trails comparing cardiovascular outcomes of various medication classes and differing blood pressure targets are needed.

Confirmation of the drug-drug interaction potential between cobicistat-boosted antiretroviral regimens and hormonal contraceptives.

BACKGROUND: Cobicistat (COBI), a CYP3A inhibitor, is a pharmacokinetic enhancer that increases exposures of the HIV protease inhibitors (PIs) atazanavir (ATV) and darunavir (DRV). The potential drug interaction between COBI-boosted PIs and hormonal contraceptives, which are substrates of intestinal efflux transporters and extensively metabolized by CYP enzymes, glucuronidation and sulfation, was evaluated. METHODS: This was a Phase I, open-label, two cohort (n=18/cohort), fixed-sequence study in healthy females that evaluated the drug-drug interaction (DDI) between multiple-dose ATV+COBI or DRV+COBI and single-dose drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol (EE). DDIs were evaluated using 90% confidence intervals of the geometric least-squares mean ratios of the test (drospirenone/EE+boosted PI) versus reference (drospirenone/EE) using lack of DDI boundaries of 70-143%. Safety was assessed throughout the study. RESULTS: 29/36 participants completed the study. Relative to drospirenone/EE alone, drospirenone area under the plasma concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf) was 1.6-fold and 2.3-fold higher, and maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) was unaltered, upon coadministration with DRV+COBI and ATV+COBI, respectively. EE AUCinf decreased 30% with drospirenone/EE + DRV+COBI and was unchanged with ATV+COBI + drospirenone/EE, relative to drospirenone/EE alone. Study treatments were generally well tolerated. The majority of adverse events were mild and consistent with known safety profiles of the compounds. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with COBI-mediated CYP3A inhibition, drospirenone exposure increased following coadministration with COBI-containing regimens, with a greater increase with ATV+COBI. Thus, clinical monitoring for drospirenone-associated hyperkalaemia is recommended with DRV+COBI and ATV+COBI should not be used with drospirenone. Lower EE exposure with DRV+COBI may be attributed to inductive effects of DRV on CYP enzymes and/or intestinal efflux transporters (that is, P-gp) involved in EE disposition.